http://github.com/1Marc/cake-stuff/tree/master/live-validate
Not all the way there yet, but you get the idea.
Hint: it's an integration problem, not an MVC problem.
wirtsi wrote:
> Hey guys
>
> I've been developing web applications with Cake for almost 2 years
> and I never want go back to the old vile php ways again.
>
> I must say that with more advanced applications the MVC concept isn't
> working so good any more. With any halfway decent webapp you will have
> a lot of controller logic in the views, namely all those JavaScript
> functions you use.
>
> For example: Passing form field values to the server via ajax calls
> for validation or opening modal windows over content items (ie context
> menus etc)
>
> If you take JavaScript even a step further then you'll end up with
> frameworks like ExtJS ... you don't write a single line of HTML code
> anymore, just the body. The framework then will insert all the lists,
> menus or whatever you want onto the canvas and populate them with data
> it gets from the server via json.
>
> Working with Cake this gets really ugly .. because then you will end
> up with redundant code, data validation on the server side but also on
> the client.
>
> Yesterday I read an article on this issue (http://advogato.org/article/
> 993.html) ... it's a bit strong anti-PHP but it hits the spot. It goes
> on about combining a MVC framework (Web2Py) with a Python-to-
> Javascript compiler (Pyjamas) which in the end will result in coding
> in Python and having a framework do all the html work .. so like Ext
> but with a proper server-side backend.
>
> What also would solve the problem of code redundancy is a JS framework
> like TrimPath (http://code.google.com/p/trimpath/wiki/TrimJunction)
> where you only code in JS and the same code gets executed on the
> server and the client ... BUT ... do we really want to code ours apps
> in JavaScript? I for sure don't want to.
>
> So I had this idea yesterday how to solve this problem at least
> partly .. by partly I mean at least all the data validation.
>
> Develop a doped up form helper. Said form helper gets the validation
> rules for every field from the model and implements the JavaScript
> rules automatically ... on the server side everything stays the same.
>
> For examle if field "name" has the NOT_EMPTY validation rule, the
> DopeFormHelper could add this validation to the view so even before
> submitting to the server the user gets notified of his mistake.
>
> What I'm not quite sure of is ... am I breaking all the MVC rules
> thinking like this? AFAIK the view (and therefore the Helper as well)
> should have no knowledge of any model rules or code. How do I get
> these informations in there?
>
> So what do the gurus think of this? Any ideas how to keep all that JS
> code out of our views?
>
> Enjoy your weekends
>
> wirtsi
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
No comments:
Post a Comment