Re: Cake Sites Stats

I think the above stats should be sufficient.

As an anecdotal supplement - the top sites built with cake are in a
class larger and more complex than most, if not all, of us would ever
get the opportunity to develop in our lifetime.

You don't have to worry about building a site with cake.

You should only be so lucky as to bump up against cake's limitations.

On Feb 26, 3:36 am, Sam Sherlock <sam.sherl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are a few site listed herehttp://book.cakephp.org/view/510/Sites-in-the-wild
>
> a Sony Site, Mozilla Firefox Plugins and Snook's Blog
>
> these are all real & wild.
>
> as for being in top 3 - I guess the bribes are being received by those who
> pull the right strings :)
>
> 2009/2/26 leop <ponton....@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> > > > Are there any reliable statistics for real sites built with Cake?
>
> > > #1 reliable does not go well with statistics ;)
>
> > Number of downloads is a reliable statistic.
>
> > > #2 I don't really understand what you mean by *real* for that matter I am
> > > not familiar with *unreal* sites either
>
> > real:  actually existing as a thing; occuring in fact; genuine; having
> > an absolute and necessary and not merely a contingent existence.
>
> > I hope that helps.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---