Re: svn or git?

For me Git because "complex is better than complicated, now is better than never"

also AFAIK git can svn, though svn can not git.  I might perhaps revisit svn after becoming fully intimate with all that git has to offer.  As I never really got of the ground with SVN whereas I got right into git though perhaps trying to get to grips with svn give me a head start with git

+also thanks to svn I have some undeletable folders with these 'paste line' files ?? and nothing will get rid of them

http://neeraj.name/blog/articles/789-how-to-use-branch-feature-of-git-and-work-with-github
http://www.gnome.org/~newren/eg/git-for-svn-users.html
http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSvnComparsion

2009/2/3 Esoteric <erik.kristensen@gmail.com>

While the PHP Core team is important, the linux kernel the foundation
of most modern linux systems is on git, that should prove something.
(just playing devil's advocate to you comment.)

On Feb 3, 4:44 am, Dinh <pcd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PHP Core Team decides that Subversion is more relevant than Git.
> That's why PHP source code is migrated from CVS to Subversion. Think
> about that.
>
> --
> --------------http://groups.google.com/group/phpvietnam

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---