Whilst it would be interesting to hear from the developers as to why
there is such as big difference between those numbers I must state
that we've been here many times before and benchmarking an
installation of CakePHP to echo "Hello World" is not a true benchmark
of the frameworks abilities.
Who in their right mind would install such a framework to echo "Hello
World"? They would sensibly code a single HTML/PHP page which would
beat the crap out of any framework's benchmark as they are not
intended to facilitate such menial tasks.
You need to test the performance of an application to get a true
picture of how the versions compare against one another as I doubt
there have been any modifications to code to improve the performance
of running a single PHP echo command.
What happens to those requests per second when you start using
behaviours, components, plugins etc?
@Robert P
> I'm currently enjoying a sensible framework.
Which framework are you using instead and what is your criteria set
which deems CakePHP to not be a sensible framework?
I personally am sticking with 1.2.x until 1.3 has been stable for some
time whilst others have been running production sites on 1.3 for some
time and I have not seen many threads questioning its performance.
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment