Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Re: Bakery...arrogance or plain lack of attention

Like I said it does seem to breed arrogance.

Writing for the bakery needs time and effort. When developers put in
such an effort they are doing that to disburse their knowledge to
other developers. Their efforts should be lauded and not taken lightly
or their work criticized.

So if you look your questions to me you will notice that it does breed
arrogance.

Accept that the bakery has problems, fix it or get rid of it. Plain
and simple.

Having said that I am not planning to write any more for the bakery
and I do hope other programmers follow suit.

-Jayesh

On Apr 25, 11:46 pm, jacmoe <jac...@mail.dk> wrote:
> That doesn't give you carte blanche to be arrogant, does it?
>
> What have you done for CakePHP if I may ask? :)
>
> A couple of weeks ago I posted this topic:http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/e3a1f469...
> With the title 'Let's get rid of TheBakery'.
>
> I volunteered as a moderator, but there's still lots of things to do.
> And the software itself needs some fixing.
>
> Feel free to fork it.
>
> I would probably delete the article as well, if there haven't been any
> response in three months - I don't know what article it was, since I
> concentrate on removing spam rather than approving articles.
> Due to my newness to CakePHP mostly.
>
> So: what have you done for CakePHP ? :D
>
> Cheers
>
> Jacob
>
> On Apr 25, 11:42 am, Jayesh Wadhwani <jwadhw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > TheBakeryis supposed to be a place where cakePHP developers exchange
> > ideas which in turn enhances the framework.
>
> > I recently published a helper and it languished for pending review for
> > weeks on end. I visited the IRC and other than rude and arrogant
> > answers there was not much help.
>
> > I did not receive any emails as to why there was a delay.
>
> > Today I log in and see this message.. "This article has been deleted
> > and is not available for publication. Review TheBakeryPublishing
> > Guidelines to understand why this article was deleted."
>
> > Brilliant reviewer! Don't you think it would be a better to tell me
> > what is the exact problem so that I can correct it. According to
> > guidelines I do get 60 days. Right!
>
> > So, what is it? The reviewers just do not care, are plain lazy or just
> > purely arrogant.
>
> > If cakePHP has grown to such as level that it cannot handle thebakery
> > and breeds arrogance then I suggest that you get rid of it.
>
> > Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organdhelp others with their CakePHP related questions.
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
>
> Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions.
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
> To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en

Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en

No comments: