Re: Standard mechanism for telling why a record hasn't been deleted?

I just think it's not the same thing so it should be kept separated.
You never know when something like that can confuse you at a later
time...

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:15 AM, AD7six <andydawson76@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 4, 9:14 am, Joshua Muheim <psybea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On the plus side, at least you used validation errors which is
>> >> contextually more relevant than creating a new variable for storing
>> >> your delete-only errors IMO.
>>
>> > Agreed. Although I don't like the approach, using $validationErrors
>> > was a nice touch.
>>
>> So you guys think I'd better us the $validationErrors variable instead
>> of a new $deletionErrors variable? Is validation of creating a record
>> and validation of deleting a record "the same thing"?
>
> It's a minor point but what benefit does creating a new "your action
> didn't work because of this" variable?
>
> Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions.
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
> To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
>

Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en