Re: is Cakephp 1.2 faster than Code Igniter ?

Interesting.

You might try asking one of the cake developers, what benchmark app(s)
they have written to use for their recent performance optimization
effort.

If they have some already, why not try one of theirs?

On Nov 5, 5:11 am, "kalle.pyykko...@gmail.com"
<kalle.pyykko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm writing my computer science masters thesis about PHP-frameworks.
> All performance tests I've been able to find use "hello world"-
> application. I'm planning to code a test application with few
> frameworks. What kind of application it should be? What would you
> think are the essential requirements to get a fair results of each
> framework's performance?
>
> Currently I'm comparing CakePHP, Codeigniter, Symfony and Zend
> Framework. Do you those are the essential ones?
>
> -Kalle
>
> On 28 loka, 19:39, mark_story <mark.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 27, 9:38 pm, teknoid <teknoid.cake...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Here's a test...
>
> > > Create a file index.html in the web root of your server with the
> > > content "hello world".
> > > Now take any framework and compare the speed it takes to render... the
> > > index.html framework beats them all!
>
> > index.html framework is by far the best clearly!  Forget this CakePHP
> > crap, I'm going all index.html framework from now on.
> > /sarcasm
>
> > I would like to see some development benchmarks as well, that would be
> > interesting.  How long it takes to build an example non 'hello world'
> > app in each of these frameworks.  Like teknoid said, servers are cheap
> > man months are not.  So this benchmark could be more useful for people
> > choosing frameworks.  With the example teknoid gave, it would take 16
> > years of CakePHP hosting to equal index.html framework development
> > time.
>
> > -Mark
>
> > > On the other hand we can do another test...
>
> > > Take CakePHP and develop a fully functional application with 60 models
> > > (or so) in two months. To double it'sperformancewe purchase a
> > > dedicated server for $119/month.
> > > Or we could write one from scratch in about 4 months (if we're lucky),
> > > which means that we've spend 320 extra hours of development time (40
> > > hrs per week * 8 extra weeks) at $75/hr.. which translates to extra
> > > $24,000 spent on the project.
>
> > > I'm not really sure, which one of these tests is more pointless ...
> > > but to me it seems silly to measure a framework'sperformancewith
> > > "hello world".
>
> > > On Oct 27, 12:04 pm, "wahyu setianto" <wahyu.setia...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > I have read inhttp://www.yiiframework.com/performance, it is true ? i know
> > > > that CI is faster than cakephp because CI is not using OOP actualy
>
> > > > --
> > > > Octopus
> > > > East Java Baker
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---