> I was maybe a bit too harsh, but Mr. Wadhwani failed to notice that we
> are indeed trying to fix the issues, and that this is not borne out of
> arrogance.
> I understand that he's pissed off, of course.
> And that he's letting out some steam.
while the bakery - and the review process - is far from perfect it's
worth noting the following (for the unknowing bystanders):
The article was titled "Simple Jquery Treeview Helper"
It didn't do anything that existing code doesn't already let you do
[1]
Jayesh did discuss his article with a core member in the irc channel
weeks before this post [2]
While the article shouldn't have been deleted without a comment to the
author (I don't remember, is the deletion of stale articles
automatic?) it wasn't destined to be published and Jayesh didn't do
anything about the articles shortcoming (which would be difficult
since the main problem was surely the tiny nature of the code and that
it repeats core - and other - existing functionality)
hth
AD
[1] http://api.cakephp.org/class/html-helper#method-HtmlHelpernestedList
(amongst other code solutions)
[2] http://irc.cakephp.org/search/cakephp/Wadhwani_J
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment