Re: CakePHP 3.0.0-alpha2 released

For those small sites, is having full page cache actually needed? I would guess that performance wouldn't be a big concern in those cases

On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:47:16 AM UTC+2, HK wrote:

For small sites that I develop is very helpful. The need to use/configure/monitor extra software like varnish is pain in the ass, especially if you don't have big sites to host.

On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:28:17 AM UTC+3, José Lorenzo wrote:

HK why would you miss it? There will be no replacement for the cache helper. We recommend using Varnish, which provides the ESI tags. They are similar to the cache tags but they involve internally doing another request. We think this is a more robust and scalable solution than doing it in PHP.

On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:06:36 AM UTC+2, HK wrote:

Too sad to hear cache helper is removed. This ESI based replacement is it going to be in stable 3.0 version?

On Monday, July 28, 2014 10:13:14 AM UTC+3, José Lorenzo wrote:

CacheHelper has been removed from CakePHP. The core team feels that the functionality this helper provided is best handled by standalone servers like Varnish. While we explored building a ESI based replacement for CacheHelper, there were a number of edge cases that would have complicated the implementation.

 

--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.