Re: Documentation - Cakes bad side

Ohps....that explains it...thx for the info :)

On Oct 2, 2:15 pm, "martin.westin...@gmail.com"
<martin.westin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The search feature in the book is broken and under repair:http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/18c4e419...
>
> On Oct 2, 11:48 am, leberle <leberkne...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > Well, i change my whining to "the book-search should be optimized"...
> > searching for "input" or "inputs" shows no results, as does
> > "formhelper"...
>
> > And there is no reason to be sad Marcin, we both got what we
> > expected...you expected trolling, i expected critic-resistant fans who
> > take critic as trolling, so everything is fine :)
>
> > I do my contribution to cake in #cakephp
>
> > >>There where many of your kind here before and they just wrote the same
>
> > ...dude, you REALLY should think about this sentence...all i said was,
> > that i think that melting API and Docs together would be very helpfull
> > as it is often hard to find infos about features. But if you prefer to
> > be mister documentation-is-perfect-only-idiots-dont-find-what-they-are-
> > looking-for, then farewell dude...
>
> > On Oct 2, 11:17 am, "Marcin Domanski" <tram...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > im ashamed im always so easily provoked by trolls :)
> > > --
> > > Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info
>
> > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Marcin Domanski <tram...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > You expect right - what is complaining without helping ? useless whining...
> > > > here is your label :http://book.cakephp.org/view/189/Automagic-Form-Elements
> > > > Let me ask you this - when you learned about something that isnt
> > > > documented - did you update the book.cakephp.org with your findings ?
> > > > Don't expect much if you don't give anything...
> > > > There where many of your kind here before and they just wrote the same
> > > > as you and faded away... (you can search the group if you like)
>
> > > > --
> > > > Marcin Domanski
> > > >http://kabturek.info
>
> > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM, leberle <leberkne...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > > >> Hey dudes,
>
> > > >> I've been playing around with cake for some time now, and i really
> > > >> like cake, its a brilliant framework.
> > > >> But Cakes weakness is the documentation. There are so many features
> > > >> that are not documented yet....this really has to change, undocumented
> > > >> features are worthless features. Before cake, i was using codeigniter.
> > > >> CI is small, but fast. AND: it is documented. I know about this "CI is
> > > >> company driven shit"-talk, but at least you dont have to look in the
> > > >> core every time you wanna use a feature.
>
> > > >> Well, as this is a fan-community i expect to get flamed now, but all i
> > > >> wanna say is: cake needs better documentation. Melt the API-Refs and
> > > >> the Docs together. Devs should not have to look in the core-source to
> > > >> find out how features work (e.g.: how to change the fieldset-label
> > > >> when using the $formHelper->inputs(..) function...what i just did - u
> > > >> can pass an association named 'legend' => 'your fieldset title' along
> > > >> with the other, not associativ entries...as far as i can see: not
> > > >> documented..correct me if i'm wrong )
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---