features (private, public, protected, static, constant), etc.
On May 28, 6:44 pm, Marcelo Andrade <mfandr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Miles J <mileswjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sadly enough, tons of people still use PHP4.
> > But dont worry, I believe 1.3 (or maybe it was 2.0) will be pure PHP
> > 5.
>
> > On May 28, 3:14 am, devportals <balasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> hi friends,
> >> I couldn't understand why cake still support php-4?
> >> Don't u think going with pure php-5 way will make cake more robust?
>
> I'm sorry if it's a "dumb newbie" question, but what
> features *exactly* do we expect in a pure-PHP5 Cake ?
>
> The main thing what I miss is a native sqlite3 driver.
> But the ticked #3003 works fine. I used ZF too and
> magic methods is not a real need to me. In my
> applications I still haven't any serious PHP4 specific
> performance or security issues either.
>
> My serves already are PHP5 but I still prefer using
> CakePHP.
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> MARCELO DE F. ANDRADE
> Belem, PA, Amazonia, Brazil
> Linux User #221105
>
> http://mfandrade.wordpress.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
No comments:
Post a Comment